Publication Ethics

A. Writer's Ethics

1. Reporting; the author must provide information about the process and results his research to the editor honestly, clearly, and thoroughly, and always store research data properly and securely.

2. Originality and plagiarism; The author must ensure that the manuscript that has been sent/submitted to the editor is the original manuscript, written by himself, sourced from their own ideas and ideas, and not plagiarizing the writings or ideas of others. Authors are strictly forbidden to change the name of the source a cited reference to someone else's name.

3. Repeat delivery; the author must inform that the manuscript sent/submitted to the editor is a manuscript that has never been submitted/submitted to publishers of other journals/publications. If it is found "redundancy" submission of manuscripts to other publishers, the editor will reject the manuscript sent by the author.

4. Author status; the author must inform the editor that the author has competence or qualifications in a particular field of expertise in accordance with the the field of published science, namely librarianship. Authors who submitted manuscripts to the editor is the first author (co-author) so that if a problem is found in the the process of publishing the manuscript can be completed immediately.

5. Script writing errors; the author must immediately inform the editor if errors are found in the writing of the manuscript, both the results of the review and the results edit. The writing errors include writing the name, affiliation / agency, quotes, as well as other writings that can reduce the meaning and substance of the manuscript. If If that happens, the author must immediately propose improvements to the manuscript.

6. Disclosure of conflicts of interest; authors must understand the ethics of scientific publications in above to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties, so that manuscripts can be processed smoothly and safely.

B. Editor's Ethics

1. Publication decision; editors must ensure that the manuscript review process is comprehensive, transparent, objective, fair and prudent. This is the basis editor in making a decision on a manuscript, rejected or accepted. In this case, the editorial board acts as the manuscript selection team.

2. Publication information; editors must ensure that manuscript writing guidelines for authors and other interested parties can be accessed and at ……….. clearly, both printed and electronic versions.

3. Sharing of peer-reviewed manuscripts; editors must ensure reviewers and manuscript materials for review, as well as informing the provisions and process of reviewing the manuscript clear to reviewers. 4. Objectivity and neutrality; editors must be objective, neutral, and honest in editing manuscript, regardless of gender, business side, ethnicity, religion, race, class, and nationality of the author.

5. Confidentiality; editors must take good care of any information, especially regarding the privacy of the author and distribution of the manuscript.

6. Disclosure of conflicts of interest; editors must understand the ethics of scientific publications in above to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties, so that The script publishing process runs smoothly and safely.

C. Reviewer Ethics

1. Objectivity and neutrality; reviewers must be honest, objective, unbiased, independent, and only side with scientific truth. The script review process is carried out professionally regardless of gender, business side, ethnicity, religion, race, between groups, and the nationality of the author.

2. Clarity of reference sources; the reviewer must ensure that the source references/text citations are appropriate and credible (can be used) accountable). If an error or deviation is found in the writing reference sources/quotes, the reviewer must immediately inform the editor to make improvements by the author according to the notes from the reviewer.

3. The effectiveness of peer-review; the reviewer must respond to the manuscript that has been sent by editor and work in accordance with the time of peer-review has been established (maximum 2 weeks). If you need extra time in the manuscript review must immediately report (confirm) to the secretariat editor.

4. Disclosure of conflicts of interest; reviewers must understand the ethics of publication above to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties, so that the process of publishing the manuscript runs smoothly and safely.

D. Journal Management Ethics

1. Decision making; the journal manager/editorial board must describe the mission and organizational goals, particularly those related to policy setting and decision to issue a journal without any particular interest.

2. Freedom; journal managers must give freedom to reviewers and editor to create a comfortable working atmosphere and respect privacy writer.

3. Guarantees and promotions; journal managers must guarantee and protect property rights intellectual property rights (copyright), as well as being transparent in managing the funds received by third party. In addition, journal managers must publish and promote the results of publications to the public by providing guarantees of benefits in script use.

4. Disclosure of conflicts of interest; Journal managers must understand the ethics of publication above to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties, so that the manuscript publishing process runs smoothly and safely